Generator Score
← Back to the CO-shutoff table

UL 2201 vs PGMA G300: not the same claim

Last reviewed July 2026.

Two ANSI-approved standards address generator carbon monoxide, and generator marketing tends to blur them into one reassuring blob. They differ in what they require and — just as important for a buyer — in who vouches for compliance.

What each standard requires

What CPSC's modeling found

In CPSC's effectiveness analysis, generators compliant with UL 2201 would avert nearly 100% of the CO deaths occurring with non-compliant machines; PGMA G300-compliant machines would avert about 87% (CPSC report). Both are enormous improvements over nothing; they are not equivalent.

Who vouches for compliance — the buyer's question

The market reality

CPSC's blunt finding: compliance with UL 2201 "appears to be minimal," and G300 compliance, "although greater, is still lacking for most models or units currently being sold" — against roughly 80 deaths a year. That gap is why a mandatory federal standard has been in rulemaking since 2023, and it's the entire reason to check the standard behind the sticker before hurricane season instead of during it.

Every generator line's claim, tiered by who stands behind it →

We test nothing and give no safety advice — we index standards, listings, manufacturer citations and CPSC's record, with attribution. No shutoff standard makes enclosed-space use safe; CPSC placement guidance governs at every tier.

← Back to the full table